.png)
The Home of Culture Research: The Business of Culture I 2026 I Download Now
What Outreach Discovered About the Future of Remote Teams
I DEEP DIVE INSIDER PROFILES
.png)
Outreach learned early that distributed teams do not need the office recreated online. They need clearer systems, more deliberate management and enough trust for people to work without being constantly watched.
When Outreach moved its onboarding online, one of the first things the company had to abandon was the assumption that remote work should look like office work conducted through a screen.
Before the shift, new hires could be flown in for a week or two of in-person onboarding. When that was no longer possible, Outreach rebuilt the experience for remote delivery in roughly three business days. Shane Price, who worked on learning and development at Outreach, later reflected that much of the initial anxiety came from familiarity: companies had always onboarded people in person, so it felt as though that was the only way to do it properly.
The experience helped shape a broader lesson about distributed work. Remote teams do not necessarily need more management. They need management to become more explicit.
When everybody is sitting together, information can travel accidentally. A new employee overhears a conversation, asks somebody beside them how something works or sees how a manager handles a difficult customer call. Once that shared physical environment disappears, companies have to decide which parts of that learning were important and create a deliberate way for them to travel.
Outreach began treating that as a systems problem.
For sales teams in particular, the company has long placed emphasis on clear operating rhythms. Its own manager training for distributed SDR teams focuses on the mechanics underneath performance: what managers should actually measure, how they diagnose problems from the data and what needs to happen consistently enough that a rep can navigate their day without waiting for a manager to tell them what comes next.
That matters because remote work exposes vague management very quickly. In an office, a manager can compensate for unclear priorities by checking in constantly. A distributed team feels that ambiguity much faster. People need to know what they own, where to find information and how success is being judged. Otherwise flexibility simply becomes uncertainty.
Former Chief People Officer Leslie Pendergrast described Outreach's philosophy in similarly practical terms. Her advice to leaders managing people remotely was to enable flexible schedules while showing trust, rather than using visibility as a proxy for whether somebody was working. The assumption should be that people will do their best work without a manager having direct line of sight into their day.
Trust in a remote company is easy to describe as a cultural value. It becomes much more useful when it changes what a manager actually does. Outreach's experience points towards giving people clear outcomes and then allowing more flexibility around how the work gets done.
The other part of the equation is making strong work visible. Sales organisations have always learned by watching their best people, but distributed teams cannot rely on sitting beside a top performer and picking things up informally. Outreach's own product philosophy reflects the same problem: capture what good looks like and make it easier for the wider team to learn from it.
.png)
Outreach has highlighted customers using recorded calls as a learning library, with new hires listening to strong examples and experienced reps revisiting calls to understand what worked. The broader principle is useful beyond sales: remote teams need ways to turn individual knowledge into shared knowledge rather than leaving expertise trapped inside private conversations.
For managers, this changes the purpose of a meeting. If information can be documented or learned asynchronously, gathering everybody on a call becomes more useful when the conversation requires judgement. A manager can spend time coaching around an unusual deal or helping somebody think through a problem instead of using the meeting to repeat information that could have been available elsewhere.
That is where remote work starts to become an operating model rather than a location policy. The company also learned that onboarding has to create context much earlier.
A new employee working remotely cannot spend the first few weeks gradually absorbing how the organisation works. They need enough structure to understand the role and enough exposure to other people to begin building the relationships they will later rely on. Outreach's remote onboarding work deliberately recreated the learning outcomes of its previous in-person programme rather than simply putting the old sessions onto video calls.
Good remote onboarding is not an online orientation. It is the first attempt to show somebody where knowledge lives, who they can go to and how work actually moves through the company.
That does not mean forcing every interaction to become a social event. Some of the most useful connection in distributed teams comes from people solving something together. Teams still need informal relationships, but the stronger long-term bond often comes from understanding how colleagues work and knowing they will respond when help is needed.
Recent employee feedback on Outreach reflects both sides of that equation. Employees have described flexibility and remote work positively while also pointing to the importance of leadership visibility and access to information as the company has become larger.
That tension is useful because it shows why remote culture is never finished.
Giving people freedom over where they work does not automatically create a strong distributed organisation. As a company grows, information becomes easier to fragment. Leadership can feel further away. The informal relationships that once helped people navigate the business need new ways to form.
Outreach's experience suggests that the better question is where synchronisation is genuinely valuable. People need clear systems for the repeatable parts of work, access to useful examples when they are learning and managers who intervene when judgement is required rather than simply because they cannot see someone working.
It also explains why the future of remote teams may have less to do with remote work itself than with the quality of management underneath it. Distributed work forces companies to confront things an office can temporarily hide: unclear ownership, knowledge that only exists in someone's head, meetings without a purpose and managers who confuse presence with performance.
Fix those, and distance becomes much less interesting. For Outreach, one of the enduring lessons from building remote teams is that flexibility works best when the surrounding organisation becomes more deliberate. Give people the context to understand what matters, build systems that make good work easier to repeat and then trust them to get on with it.